Part 1. Source — prioritizing ground water resource management
It is no exaggeration to note that Denmark’s water and wastewater sectors stand out on the international water scene. There are many and more reasons for this — much of which this three-part series aims to explore. To begin aptly enough, a significant distinguishing feature of Danish water concerns how it is sourced.
Unlike many countries, virtually all Danish drinking water is drawn from groundwater. Although groundwater abstraction brings its own challenges, what Denmark demonstrates is that if done correctly, sustainably managed groundwater fosters benefits that carry forward throughout the water cycle and beyond.
Rune Kier, Skanderborg Utility observes: ’Because of their importance, we have a widespread political and societal agreement that groundwater resources must be protected from pollution and other harmful impacts of human activities — that water should be protected, not treated.’
It follows that a key prerequisite for protection is thorough insight on groundwater resources which can inform effective action plans and legislation that prohibit the use of pesticides, and other industrial activities, in drilling areas.
Kier explains that this protect-not-treat ethos has therefore prompted a number of initiatives to secure its intentions, and as he says, "has led to all sorts of sustainable practices and knock-on benefits for the rest of the water supply sector, and the environment.” A fundamental initiative has been groundwater mapping.
Groundwater mapping
The integrative effort involved identifying all national aquifers, gathering volumetric data on them, and developing tools for structuring, modelling, and visualizing data into usable formats.
An industry player supporting groundwater management initiatives has been the Danish engineering consultancy company, NIRAS. Mette Neerup Jeppesen, manager for water supply at NIRAS, describes several projects involving collecting and modelling groundwater data, in which the company partnered with water suppliers: “We developed and deployed a lot of high-tech systems for the mapping, but it’s been well worth the effort. It’s clear that careful management and protection of aquifers provides a route to avoiding a lot of expense and effort on treating drinking water.”
As an example of this, Kier explained: “With assurance on aquifers, we can use only the simplest of filtering techniques for treating groundwater, in fact just two types of filter. It’s simple and low-tech, without the need for disinfectants like chlorine or complex processes, and saves on operational and infrastructure expenditure.”
Comprehensive aquifer data has also been used to build groundwater resource management tools. In the city of Odense for instance, aquifer data is utilized by an intelligent control system for water abstraction. The system is fully integrated with existing supervisory control and data acquisition (SCADA) systems, and helps ensure optimisation across seasons and usage.
Aquifer mapping has also facilitated efforts which carry the dual benefit of protecting resources, whilst contributing to the environment. A prime example is afforestation to protect groundwater and well-field catchment areas, which aid in reducing the national CO2 footprint by absorbing CO2 from the atmosphere.
Developing the right tools
Specialists in geographic information systems and geoscience, Danish software outfit I•GIS, played a key role developing novel tools to support groundwater mapping. Together with input from other stakeholders, the work has culminated in what’s come to be known as the so-called Danish Model for mapping and protecting groundwater.
Tom Martlev Pallesen, head of production & consultancy at I•GIS, expanded on the development of new 3D software for inspecting and visualizing geologic models.
“In the beginning of the mapping campaign, new mapping methods were developed and refined, especially geophysical methods. The data from those created a new demand for geological mapping software able to handle these new datatypes and the rapidly growing amount of data. In this context the modelling software GeoScene3D, as we see it today, was developed.”
A key strength of GeoScene 3D is its overcoming traditional problems associated with modelling with different approaches and different software, which led to creating a large, inhomogeneous datasets.
Instead, when a geological model is made in GeoScene3D it can be exported in different file formats, including the Danish Model database format, which makes it possible to upload a geological model directly from GeoScene3D to the national model database, where other stakeholders (modelers, hydrologists, utilities, committees, etc.) can download and use the results.
GeoScene3D can also be connected to the Danish borehole database and the geophysical database GERDA for data import. It’s this kind of streamlining — enabling better insights and interoperability between stakeholders — that has empowered water utilities and other actors to take a proactive approach to sustainable groundwater management.
International value
With almost complete reliance on aquifers for supply of drinking water, it’s clear why Denmark has invested as it has with groundwater mapping and management solutions. Nevertheless, given the state of water scarcity in many regions of the world, there is a strong case to be made for aquifer mapping solutions being deployed around the world.
That all potential fresh water resources come to be known is of clear benefit to all nations — enabling greater access to water, better management of resources, and evidence-based guidelines to help inform plans for environmental protection and industrial development that work to safeguard water resources for future generations.
Aarhus Vand’s Jacobsen remarks: “We’ve developed a lot of tools that have proven very useful here in Denmark, but which would be neatly applied in other countries to similar success. These are very marketable solutions for export.”
Rune Kier agreed, suggesting that, “mapping on a national scale may be challenging in larger countries, but the solution itself is technically feasible and would be most valuable.”